Analysis of risk factors and modern clinical and laboratory peculiarities of non-aggravated and aggravated forms of the urogenital chlamydial infection in men

Cite item


The authors present the results of studies of risk factors at the contamination with С. trachomatis and of the development of complicated forms of the urogenital chlamydial infection at men, modern peculiarities of the clinical course of the urogenital chlamydiosis have been reflected. Goal: studies of factors of the risk of contamination with С. trachomatis and development of aggravates forms of urogenital chlamydial infection and the analysis of modern clinical peculiarities of the disease in men of the reproductive age. Маterials and methods. 40 men were examined, among them 20 with urogenital chlamydial infection of lower segments of the genitourinary tract and 20 with complicated forms of urogenital chlamydial infection. The group of comparison comprised 20 men, not having clinical and laboratory features of sexually transmitted diseases and inflammatory diseases of the urogenital tract. Along with the analysis of anamnesis data of the clinical picture was performed the instrumental (transrectal ultrasonic research of the prostate) and the laboratory examination, using the microscopic, bacteriologic and molecular and biologic methods. Results. The authors established factors of risk of the contamination with urogenital chlamydial infection (age between 25 and 39 y.o., existent sexual contacts with two and more sexual partners, big number of sexual partners during the sexual practice) and factors of the risk of development of complicated forms of the chlamydial infection (patient age between 25 and 45 y.o. and the disease, lasting for more than 1 month). Main clinical implications of chlamydial urethritis and prostatitis are described.

Full Text

Анализ факторов риска и современных клинико-лабораторных особенностей неосложненных и осложненных форм урогенитальной хламидийной инфекции у мужчин


  1. Инфекции, передаваемые половым путем. Клинические рекомендации. Дерматовенерология / Под ред. А.А. Кубановой. М.: ДЭКС-Пресс. 2012.
  2. Молочков В.А. Урогенитальный хламидиоз. М.: Изд. «БИНОМ»; 2006.
  3. Ostaszewska-Puchalska I., Zdrodowska-Stefanow B., Badyda J. et al. Antichlamydial antibodies in the serum and expressed prostatic secretion in prostatitis. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz) 2004; 52: 277—283.
  4. Corradi G., Konkoly Thege M., Panovics J. et al. Is seminal fluid a suitable specimen for detecting chlamydial infection in men? Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung 1995; 42: 389—394.
  5. Gdoura R., Daoudi F., Bouzid F. et al. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in semen and urethral specimens from male members of infertile couples in Tunisia. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2001; 6: 14—20.
  6. Skerk V., Schonwald S., Krhen I, et al. Etiology of chronic prostatitis. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2002; 19: 471—474.
  7. Болотовский А.В., Перламутров Ю.Н. Выявление хламидийной инфекции при хроническом простатите. Актуальные вопросы диагностики и лечения хламидийных инфекций. М.: 1990; 30—31.
  8. Валиева С.А. Частота и спектр инфекций, передаваемых половым путем (ИППП), у больных хроническим простатитом. IX Всерос. съезд дерматовенерологов: Тез. науч. работ. Т. П. М.: 2005; 68—69.
  9. Гомберг М.А. Хламидиоз и простатиты. ИППП, 2002; 4: 3—8.
  10. Молочков В.А. Хронический уретрогенный простатит. М.: Медицина 1998.
  11. Сафина О.Н. Урогенитальный хламидиоз и хронический простатит. Сиб. журн. дерматол. венерол., 2003; 4: 62—63.
  12. Hosseinzadeh S., Eley A., Pacey A.A. Semen quality of men with asymptomatic chlamydial infection. J Androl 2004; 25: 104—109.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies